Death of a Salesman Comparisson

death of a Salesman After adaptation and watching Arthur Millers demise of a Salesman, it was clear that at that place were many a(prenominal) similarities and differences between the icon and the text. Many of the actors elect for roles in the cinema seemed to have run across Millers portrayal of the characters. Between Willy feeling intricate and lost to Lindas vivid use up for Willy they altogether were presented genuinely well. However, in the add, Willy Loman is visualised as a man of huge size while in the image he is much petty(a)er.Although Dustin Hoffman depicts the character of Willy Loman well, he gets so enthralled in the foment of the scene that it sometimes makes the audience respect if Miller intended for Willy to be so dramatic and emotional. At times its overpowering and even difficult to understand what Hoffman is saying. A problem with converting plays or books to motion prospect is one cant see pictures that go on with text. The top dog must create its consume pictures of what is cosmos described.The portrayal of Linda Loman on privacy was completely different than what I had imagined her to be as while I was reading. I envisioned her to be a petty(a) younger and a lot more than(prenominal) than run-down and tired from dealing with not only Willy and his lost life nevertheless to her two sons and the social issues they have as well. I precept her to be more distressed. As far as game goes, the storyline was almost exactly the same in the movie and the play. Some scenes were interchanged, still not so much as to disrupt the development or anatomical structure of the story.It also looks as though the manager of the film purposely made it out like the movie was taking rate on a stage, probably to anticipate true to the fact that above all, Death of a Salesman is a play. I matte like the flashbacks were complete and in the film it visually helped the audience to understand what was release on. In the t ext on the separate hand, it was up to the reader to understand when they happened and who all were part of them. I think the movie adaption of this was done rattling well wake how Ben wasnt really there and it was bonnie Willys imagination when it came time for a flashback.The writers of the film script did a very good job with keeping peculiar(prenominal) lines clear and understandable, keeping in mind that they had to most likely change small things here and there. Overall I set up most of the movie compared to the play a success. Between choosing actors who fit their parts as though they actually were Willy Loman, sack Loman, Bernard and so forth, to being spot on with the maculation for the most part they were two very similar. Some failures in my opinion existed in the movie when comparing to the text as well.Read also Realism and Expressionism in Death of a SalesmanWhen reading the play I didnt see Willy and Linda being so touchy feely, as in the kissing and hugging that went on. Also the charr that Willy cheats on Linda with is much younger than I imagined. She is much more annoying oddly with her laughing than as I saw her to be in the play itself. Lastly, toward the end, Biff seemed in my eyes much more emotional than I saw him to be through the text. I saw more anger and distress instead of care about willy and crying that happened in the movie. Overall, yes there were successes and failures when comparing the film to the actual play, but I must say both were quite similar.